Andhra University CDOE — M.A. English Literature
Year 1, Semester 2
Paper II: British Drama-II
Assignment I
Introduction: Christopher Marlowe's Edward II departs from his earlier plays of titanic, overreaching heroes to present a tragedy of a weak, self-indulgent monarch whose personal failings precipitate political catastrophe and profound personal suffering. The play is widely regarded as a study in kingly weakness rather than grandeur.
The King's Personal Weakness: Edward's tragedy stems not from external fate but from his own character flaws — his reckless favoritism toward Gaveston and later Spencer, his neglect of statecraft, and his inability to balance private affection with public duty. His obsessive attachment to unworthy favorites alienates the nobility and his queen, Isabella, setting in motion the rebellion that destroys him.
Political Consequences of Misrule: Edward's misgovernment is depicted concretely: he showers Gaveston with titles and wealth while ignoring the barons' legitimate grievances, provoking civil war. Marlowe shows how a ruler's private weakness translates directly into national instability, contrasting Edward's self-indulgence with Mortimer's ruthless political ambition.
The Depths of Misery: The play's final acts chart Edward's fall with unflinching detail — his forced abdication, imprisonment in a filthy dungeon standing in sewage, psychological torment, and eventual brutal murder. Marlowe lingers on this physical and mental degradation, transforming Edward from a failed ruler into a genuinely pathetic, even sympathetic, figure whose suffering exceeds his crimes.
Marlowe's Departure from Heroic Tragedy: Unlike Tamburlaine or Faustus, Edward possesses no grandeur of ambition or intellect; his tragedy lies precisely in his ordinariness and weakness magnified by the burden of kingship he cannot bear. This makes the play, in Charles Lamb's famous estimation, deeply moving in its portrayal of suffering rather than admiration-inspiring in its portrayal of will.
Conclusion: Through Edward's self-inflicted political ruin and the harrowing depiction of his physical and psychological torment, Marlowe crafts a tragedy centered wholly on royal weakness and human misery rather than heroic aspiration, making Edward II a landmark in the dramatization of failed kingship.
Introduction: Marlowe's conception of the tragic hero diverges significantly from both the Aristotelian model of the noble figure undone by a single hamartia and the Shakespearean hero whose complex inner conflict drives the tragedy, offering instead a protagonist defined by monomaniacal will or, in Edward's case, by conspicuous personal weakness.
Departure from the Aristotelian Model: Aristotle's tragic hero is a figure of high standing whose downfall arises from a single tragic flaw amid otherwise admirable qualities, evoking pity and fear through a process of recognition and reversal. Edward, by contrast, lacks the sustained nobility Aristotle requires; his flaws — indulgence, weak judgment, favoritism — pervade his character from the outset rather than emerging as an isolated error, making his suffering less a matter of tragic irony than of prolonged self-inflicted decline.
Contrast with the Shakespearean Hero: Shakespearean tragic heroes such as Hamlet, Lear, or Macbeth possess rich psychological interiority, engaging in soliloquy-driven self-examination that reveals evolving moral consciousness. Marlowe's Edward is comparatively less introspective in the early acts; his tragedy is built more through external action and spectacle than through nuanced psychological development, though Marlowe does grant him poignant lyrical laments in his final imprisonment.
The Marlovian "Overreacher" Reconsidered: While heroes like Tamburlaine and Faustus embody the "Marlovian overreacher" driven by superhuman ambition for power or knowledge, Edward inverts this pattern — his tragedy arises from underreaching, from failure to assert the authority his position demands, making him a study in insufficiency rather than excess of will.
Emotional Register: Pathos over Awe: Where Marlowe's earlier heroes command awe through rhetorical grandeur and superhuman aspiration, Edward increasingly evokes pathos and pity through physical suffering and helplessness, particularly in the dungeon scenes, aligning him more with a suffering victim than a heroic agent, a register closer to pure pathetic tragedy than either Aristotelian catharsis or Shakespearean moral complexity.
Conclusion: Marlowe's Edward thus represents a distinct type of tragic hero — neither the flawed-but-noble Aristotelian figure nor the introspective Shakespearean protagonist, but a weak, indulgent king whose prolonged humiliation and suffering generate a uniquely Marlovian tragedy of pathos and political ruin.
Introduction: R. B. Sheridan's The Rivals is a witty Restoration-influenced comedy of manners that satirizes contemporary social affectations — sentimentalism, false gentility, and malapropism — through sparkling dialogue and skillfully constructed comic situations.
Satire on Sentimental Romance: The play mocks the fashionable cult of sentimental love through Lydia Languish, whose infatuation with the idea of a poor, secretive elopement (rather than genuine affection) satirizes the excessive novel-reading young women of the period who prized romantic melodrama over practical good sense. Her disappointment upon learning her suitor is actually wealthy and respectable comically inverts sentimental convention.
Mrs. Malaprop and Linguistic Comedy: The character of Mrs. Malaprop, whose name has entered the language, provides the play's most celebrated comic device — her habitual misuse of sophisticated vocabulary ("illiterate him quite from your memory" for "obliterate") satirizes pretensions to learning and refinement among the socially aspirational, generating continuous verbal humor.
Satire on Duelling Culture and False Honour: Through Bob Acres and Sir Lucius O'Trigger, Sheridan satirizes the absurdities of the contemporary code of honour and duelling, showing Acres as a coward masking his fear behind bravado ("sneezing" courage) while Sir Lucius embodies reckless, outdated notions of honour pursued for its own sake.
Comic Plot Mechanics: The elaborate disguises (Captain Absolute posing as the poor Ensign Beverley), mistaken identities, and intercepted letters generate classic farcical comedy, building toward a chaotic near-duel resolved through comic revelation, all engineered with Sheridan's characteristic precision of plotting.
Conclusion: Through linguistic wit, satirical characterization, and farcical plotting, Sheridan exposes and gently mocks the social pretensions, romantic excesses, and outdated codes of his age, securing The Rivals a lasting place as one of the finest comedies of manners in English drama.
Introduction: Although The Rivals is often celebrated primarily as a comedy of manners and satire, it also incorporates elements of the sentimental comedy tradition popular in eighteenth-century theatre, blending laughter with moments of genuine feeling, moral resolution, and benevolent characters.
Presence of Sentimental Elements: Sentimental comedy typically emphasizes virtuous characters, emotional appeals, and the ultimate triumph of goodness and true feeling over artifice. Sheridan incorporates such elements through the eventual sincere reconciliation of Lydia and Jack Absolute, whose relationship, despite its comic complications, resolves in genuine mutual affection rather than mere social convenience.
Sir Anthony Absolute and Benevolent Authority: Sir Anthony, despite his blustering temper, ultimately acts as a benevolent patriarchal figure who wishes for his son's genuine happiness, a trope common to sentimental comedy where authority figures, however comically drawn, are fundamentally well-intentioned and contribute to the harmonious resolution.
Julia and Faulkland Subplot: The secondary romance between Julia and the excessively jealous, self-tormenting Faulkland introduces a more explicitly sentimental register, with Julia's patient, forgiving devotion and Faulkland's eventual repentance echoing the moral seriousness and emotional sincerity central to sentimental drama, even as Sheridan gently satirizes Faulkland's excessive sensibility.
Balance of Satire and Sentiment: Crucially, Sheridan does not allow sentimentality to overwhelm comic satire; rather, he balances the two, using sentimental moments to provide emotional grounding and moral resolution while reserving his sharpest wit for satirizing affectation, making the play a hybrid that both participates in and gently critiques the sentimental comedy tradition it inherited.
Comic Resolution and Moral Order: The play's ending, with misunderstandings cleared and virtuous love rewarded, aligns with sentimental comedy's insistence on a morally satisfying conclusion, reinforcing the genre's characteristic optimism about human nature's capacity for reform and genuine feeling.
Conclusion: While fundamentally a satirical comedy of manners, The Rivals incorporates significant sentimental elements — sincere emotion, benevolent authority, and moral resolution — that align it with the sentimental comedy tradition, demonstrating Sheridan's skillful fusion of wit and feeling.
Introduction: Christopher Fry, a key figure in the mid-twentieth-century revival of poetic drama, is often said to "dramatize a mystery" in plays such as The Lady's Not for Burning, meaning his works explore the inexplicable, often spiritual, dimensions of human existence through richly poetic language rather than straightforward realistic plotting.
Poetic Language as Vehicle for Mystery: Fry's dense, metaphor-laden verse deliberately resists purely rational or naturalistic explanation, using imagery and wordplay to suggest that human experience — love, death, faith, identity — exceeds the capacity of ordinary prose or logical exposition, thereby dramatizing mystery through form as much as content.
Thematic Concern with the Inexplicable: Fry's plots frequently hinge on paradox and the inexplicable workings of fate or grace — characters wishing to die who are prevented, accusations of witchcraft that dissolve into comedy, coincidences that verge on the miraculous — suggesting an underlying providential or mysterious order governing human affairs beyond rational control.
Comedy as Access to Transcendence: Fry believed comedy, rather than tragedy, was better suited to exploring life's mysterious abundance, since comedy's acceptance of life's contradictions and its movement toward reconciliation mirrors a quasi-religious affirmation of existence's ultimately mysterious, benevolent order, even amid apparent chaos or despair.
Characters Confronting the Numinous: Fry's protagonists often undergo experiences that brush against the numinous or spiritual — moments of near-death, transformative love, or confrontation with mortality — that resist tidy resolution, leaving an residual sense of wonder and mystery rather than complete rational closure.
Conclusion: Through richly poetic language, paradoxical plotting, and a comic vision oriented toward transcendence, Christopher Fry's drama consistently dramatizes the mysterious, ultimately unexplainable dimensions of human existence, aligning his work with the mid-century revival of verse drama's spiritual ambitions.
0 Comments